Multivariable Mendelian Randomization: The Use of Pleiotropic Genetic Variants to Estimate Causal Effects

نویسندگان

  • Stephen Burgess
  • Simon G. Thompson
چکیده

A conventional Mendelian randomization analysis assesses the causal effect of a risk factor on an outcome by using genetic variants that are solely associated with the risk factor of interest as instrumental variables. However, in some cases, such as the case of triglyceride level as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, it may be difficult to find a relevant genetic variant that is not also associated with related risk factors, such as other lipid fractions. Such a variant is known as pleiotropic. In this paper, we propose an extension of Mendelian randomization that uses multiple genetic variants associated with several measured risk factors to simultaneously estimate the causal effect of each of the risk factors on the outcome. This "multivariable Mendelian randomization" approach is similar to the simultaneous assessment of several treatments in a factorial randomized trial. In this paper, methods for estimating the causal effects are presented and compared using real and simulated data, and the assumptions necessary for a valid multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis are discussed. Subject to these assumptions, we demonstrate that triglyceride-related pathways have a causal effect on the risk of coronary heart disease independent of the effects of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

RE: “MULTIVARIABLE MENDELIAN RANDOMIZATION: THE USE OF PLEIOTROPIC GENETIC VARIANTS TO ESTIMATE CAUSAL EFFECTS” In the manuscript “Multivariable Mendelian Randomiza- tion: the Use of Pleiotropic Genetic Variants to Estimate

In the manuscript “Multivariable Mendelian Randomization: the Use of Pleiotropic Genetic Variants to Estimate Causal Effects” (1), we commented on an analysis method recently used in the literature (2), which we referred to as a “regression-based method.” We presented simulation results showing that the method had some weaknesses—in particular, not estimating the same parameter as that from a 2...

متن کامل

Extending the MR‐Egger method for multivariable Mendelian randomization to correct for both measured and unmeasured pleiotropy

Methods have been developed for Mendelian randomization that can obtain consistent causal estimates while relaxing the instrumental variable assumptions. These include multivariable Mendelian randomization, in which a genetic variant may be associated with multiple risk factors so long as any association with the outcome is via the measured risk factors (measured pleiotropy), and the MR-Egger (...

متن کامل

Using Multivariable Mendelian Randomization to Disentangle the Causal Effects of Lipid Fractions

BACKGROUND Previous Mendelian randomization studies have suggested that, while low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) and triglycerides are causally implicated in coronary artery disease (CAD) risk, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) may not be, with causal effect estimates compatible with the null. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS The causal effects of these three lipid fractions can be bet...

متن کامل

Pleiotropy-robust Mendelian randomization.

Background The potential of Mendelian randomization studies is rapidly expanding due to: (i) the growing power of genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analyses to detect genetic variants associated with several exposures; and (ii) the increasing availability of these genetic variants in large-scale surveys. However, without a proper biological understanding of the pleiotropic working of ge...

متن کامل

Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression

BACKGROUND The number of Mendelian randomization analyses including large numbers of genetic variants is rapidly increasing. This is due to the proliferation of genome-wide association studies, and the desire to obtain more precise estimates of causal effects. However, some genetic variants may not be valid instrumental variables, in particular due to them having more than one proximal phenotyp...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 181  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015